↓ Skip to main content

“There is hunger in my community”: a qualitative study of food security as a cyclical force in sex work in Swaziland

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“There is hunger in my community”: a qualitative study of food security as a cyclical force in sex work in Swaziland
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Fielding-Miller, Zandile Mnisi, Darrin Adams, Stefan Baral, Caitlin Kennedy

Abstract

Swaziland has the highest HIV prevalence in the world - 32% of adults are currently living with HIV - and many Swazis are chronically food insecure - in 2011 one in four Swazis required food aid from the World Food Programme. In southern Africa, food insecurity has been linked to high-risk sexual behaviors, difficulty with antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, higher rates of mother-to-child HIV transmission, and more rapid HIV progression. Sex workers in Swaziland are a population that is most at risk of HIV. Little is known about the context and needs of sex workers in Swaziland who are living with HIV, nor how food insecurity may affect these needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 22%
Social Sciences 47 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Psychology 14 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 64 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,525,459
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,686
of 16,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,259
of 319,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#33
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.