↓ Skip to main content

Non-synonymous variations in cancer and their effects on the human proteome: workflow for NGS data biocuration and proteome-wide analysis of TCGA data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-synonymous variations in cancer and their effects on the human proteome: workflow for NGS data biocuration and proteome-wide analysis of TCGA data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Cole, Konstantinos Krampis, Konstantinos Karagiannis, Jonas S Almeida, William J Faison, Mona Motwani, Quan Wan, Anton Golikov, Yang Pan, Vahan Simonyan, Raja Mazumder

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have resulted in petabytes of scattered data, decentralized in archives, databases and sometimes in isolated hard-disks which are inaccessible for browsing and analysis. It is expected that curated secondary databases will help organize some of this Big Data thereby allowing users better navigate, search and compute on it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Sweden 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 70 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Computer Science 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,026,289
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,248
of 7,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,439
of 307,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#23
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.