↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between aortic baroreceptor activity and arterial pressure is not monotonic

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relationship between aortic baroreceptor activity and arterial pressure is not monotonic
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12576-011-0132-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris P. Bolter, Michael J. Turner, Carolyn J. Barrett

Abstract

Previous reports indicate that when aortic pressure (AP) falls below the threshold (P (th)) for baroreceptor sensitivity, activity in the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) may increase. To quantify and explain this anomalous behaviour, we analysed curves describing the relationship of baroreceptor fibre activity in rabbit left ADN to AP. Data were obtained in anaesthetised New Zealand White rabbits. Occlusion and release of cuffs around the inferior vena cava and descending aorta generated AP ramps (25-140 mmHg). Response curves were obtained for 173 fibres in 26 animals. Thirty percent of curves had a nadir (J-shaped curve), and in 40% activity was always present. In fibres showing activity below P (th), firing was predominantly diastolic, switching to systolic firing at P (th). The unusual behaviour of a substantial fraction of aortic baroreceptors below P (th) accounts for the J-shaped response curve of the whole ADN. We suggest that fibres that fire during diastole at pressures below P (th) may have sensory endings close to the origin of the left subclavian artery. As a consequence of this anatomical location, low pressures can impose strain on these receptors, which is then relieved by the systolic pulse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Engineering 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,272,032
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#163
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,156
of 201,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.