↓ Skip to main content

Multi‐morbidities of allergic rhinitis in adults: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force Report

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi‐morbidities of allergic rhinitis in adults: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force Report
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13601-017-0153-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Cingi, P. Gevaert, R. Mösges, C. Rondon, V. Hox, M. Rudenko, N. B. Muluk, G. Scadding, F. Manole, C. Hupin, W. J. Fokkens, C. Akdis, C. Bachert, P. Demoly, J. Mullol, A. Muraro, N. Papadopoulos, R. Pawankar, P. Rombaux, E. Toskala, L. Kalogjera, E. Prokopakis, P. W. Hellings, J. Bousquet

Abstract

This report has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force on Allergic Rhinitis (AR) comorbidities. The aim of this multidisciplinary European consensus document is to highlight the role of multimorbidities in the definition, classification, mechanisms, recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of AR, and to define the needs in this neglected area by a literature review. AR is a systemic allergic disease and is generally associated with numerous multi-morbid disorders, including asthma, eczema, food allergies, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), conjunctivitis, chronic middle ear effusions, rhinosinusitis, adenoid hypertrophy, olfaction disorders, obstructive sleep apnea, disordered sleep and consequent behavioural and educational effects. This report provides up-to-date usable information to: (1) improve the knowledge and skills of allergists, so as to ultimately improve the overall quality of patient care; (2) to increase interest in this area; and (3) to present a unique contribution to the field of upper inflammatory disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 69 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 71 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,695,782
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#63
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,378
of 330,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.