You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CuidaCare: effectiveness of a nursing intervention on the quality of life’s caregiver: cluster-randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milagros Rico-Blázquez, Esperanza Escortell-Mayor, Isabel del-Cura-González, Teresa Sanz-Cuesta, Pilar Gallego-Berciano, Gonzalo de las Casas-Cámara, Sonia Soto-Díaz, Petra García-Sanz, Natalie Harris-de-la-Vega, María Martín-Martín, Lorena Domínguez-Pérez, Araceli Rivera-Álvarez, Juan Antonio Sarrión-Bravo, Concepción Pérez-de-Hita, Marisol de-Frías-Redondo, Carmen Ferrer-Arnedo, Montserrat Hernández-Pascual, Antonio Valdivia-Pérez, Yolanda Ramallo Fariña |
| Abstract |
In Spain, family is the main source of care for dependent people. Numerous studies suggest that providing informal (unpaid) care during a prolonged period of time results in a morbidity-generating burden. Caregivers constitute a high-risk group that experiences elevated stress levels, which reduce their quality of life.Different strategies have been proposed to improve management of this phenomenon in order to minimize its impact, but definitive conclusions regarding their effectiveness are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,490,349
of 24,335,016 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#129
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,832
of 317,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,335,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.