↓ Skip to main content

Low systemic vascular resistance: differential diagnosis and outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low systemic vascular resistance: differential diagnosis and outcome
Published in
Critical Care, June 1999
DOI 10.1186/cc343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jairo Melo, Jay I Peters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and prognosis of the various causes of low systemic vascular resistance (SVR). DESIGN: Analysis of consecutive patients over a 5-year period; retrospective review. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a large university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with unexplained hypotension and a SVR less than 800 dynes x s/cm5. BACKGROUND: There are minimal data in the medical literature determining the frequency or outcome of patients with a low SVR that is unrelated to sepsis or the sepsis syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed all hemodynamic data in a large university hospital over a 5-year period to determine the frequency and prognosis of the various causes of low SVR. Fifty-five patients with unexplained hypotension and a SVR less than 800dynesxs/cm5were identified. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (Groups 1 and 2) met the criteria for sepsis syndrome. The mean SVR for this group was 445 +/- 168 dynesxs/cm5 with an associated mortality of 50%. Group 3 contained 20 patients with possible sepsis. Thirteen patients (Group 4) were nonseptic. The mean SVR of this group was 435 +/- 180 dynes x s/cm5 with an associated mortality of 46%. Extremely low SVR (below 450 dynes x s/cm5) was associated with a significantly higher mortality regardless of the etiology. CONCLUSIONS: At least a quarter of patients with hypotension and a low SVR have nonseptic etiologies. The patients with nonseptic etiologies have a similar mortality to septic patients. Clinicians should be aware of the wide spectrum of conditions that induce a low SVR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 20%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 72%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,986
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,742
of 35,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.