You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A science & arts sensitization program in Chapultenango, 25 years after the 1982 El Chichόn eruptions (Chiapas, Mexico)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Volcanology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-5040-2-6 |
| Authors |
Dmitri Rouwet, Marta Iorio, Demetrio Polgovsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,361,534
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#110
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,912
of 212,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.