↓ Skip to main content

The etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: barrier disruption, immunological derangement, and pruritus

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation and Regeneration, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: barrier disruption, immunological derangement, and pruritus
Published in
Inflammation and Regeneration, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41232-017-0044-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawinee Rerknimitr, Atsushi Otsuka, Chisa Nakashima, Kenji Kabashima

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic skin inflammatory disorder characterized by recurrent eczema accompanied by an intractable itch that leads to an impaired quality of life. Extensive recent studies have shed light on the multifaceted pathogenesis of the disease. The complex interplay among skin barrier deficiency, immunological derangement, and pruritus contributes to the development, progression, and chronicity of the disease. Abnormalities in filaggrin, other stratum corneum constituents, and tight junctions induce and/or promote skin inflammation. This inflammation, in turn, can further deteriorate the barrier function by downregulating a myriad of essential barrier-maintaining molecules. Pruritus in AD, which may be due to hyperinnervation of the epidermis, increases pruritogens, and central sensitization compromises the skin integrity and promotes inflammation. There are unmet needs in the treatment of AD. Based on the detailed evidence available to date, certain disease mechanisms can be chosen as treatment targets. Numerous clinical trials of biological agents are currently being conducted and are expected to provide treatments for patients suffering from AD in the future. This review summarizes the etiopathogenesis of the disease and provides a rationale for choosing the novel targeted therapy that will be available in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 66 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#118
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,237
of 331,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.