You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Magnetic capture from blood rescues molecular motor function in diagnostic nanodevices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Saroj Kumar, Lasse ten Siethoff, Malin Persson, Nuria Albet-Torres, Alf Månsson |
Abstract |
Introduction of effective point-of-care devices for use in medical diagnostics is part of strategies to combat accelerating health-care costs. Molecular motor driven nanodevices have unique potentials in this regard due to unprecedented level of miniaturization and independence of external pumps. However motor function has been found to be inhibited by body fluids. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Singapore | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 40% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 24% |
Chemistry | 6 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,161,918
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#130
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,670
of 192,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.