You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M Askie, Peter Brocklehurst, Brian A Darlow, Neil Finer, Barbara Schmidt, William Tarnow-Mordi, the NeOProM Collaborative Group |
| Abstract |
The appropriate level of oxygenation for extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks' gestation) to maximise the greatest chance of survival, without incurring significant morbidity, remains unknown. Infants exposed to lower levels of oxygen (targeting oxygen saturations of <90%) in the first weeks of life are at increased risk of death, cerebral palsy, patent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary vascular resistance and apnoea, whilst those maintained in higher levels of oxygen (targeting oxygen saturations of >90%) have been reported to have greater rates of morbidity including retinopathy of prematurity and chronic lung disease. In order to answer this clinical dilemma reliably, large scale trial evidence is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 32% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 66% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,653,507
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#188
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,605
of 182,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.