You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using an integrated knowledge translation approach to build a public health research agenda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Kothari, Sandra Regan, Dana Gore, Ruta Valaitis, John Garcia, Heather Manson, Linda O’Mara |
| Abstract |
Public Health Systems Research is an emerging field of research that is gaining importance in Canada. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,247,518
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#296
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,500
of 318,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.