↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. M. Wintner, J. M. Giesinger, A. Zabernigg, G. Rumpold, M. Sztankay, A. S. Oberguggenberger, E. M. Gamper, B. Holzner

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients' quality of life than do mere physicians' ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients' homes as well. This study reports on patients' personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes. At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software. In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes). The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients' attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Psychology 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Computer Science 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 33 30%