↓ Skip to main content

Gender differences in the use of health care in China: cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender differences in the use of health care in China: cross-sectional analysis
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-13-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Song, Ying Bian

Abstract

Differences between women and men in education, employment, political and economic empowerment have been well-documented in China due to the long traditional culture that male is superior to female. This study is to explore whether the similar gender differences exist in the use of health care by analyzing hospital admission, duration of hospitalization and medical expense of both genders in a Chinese hospital.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Unspecified 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,340
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,814
of 322,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.