↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of hybrid treatment for sever multiple trauma: a case of multiple trauma for damage control laparotomy and thoracic endovascular repair

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of hybrid treatment for sever multiple trauma: a case of multiple trauma for damage control laparotomy and thoracic endovascular repair
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12245-017-0145-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naofumi Bunya, Keisuke Harada, Yosuke Kuroda, Tsubasa Toyohara, Takashi Toyohara, Narumi Kubota, Ryuichiro Kakizaki, Hideto Irifune, Shuji Uemura, Eichi Narimatsu

Abstract

Time is a crucial factor for the successful early management of the multi-trauma patient. Hybrid operating theaters, which support the integration of surgical treatment and interventional radiology, provide opportunities to reduce the time-to-surgery for life threatening conditions. We describe the early successful treatment of a 54-year-old male who sustained multiple injuries when he was hit by a 1000 kg bale of wheat that fell from a height. He was admitted with hemorrhagic shock due to intra-abdominal bleeding, an unstable fracture of the pelvis, and blunt aortic injury, which was considered to be at high risk of rupture. External fixation was applied to the pelvis in the resuscitation bay, and the patient was transferred to a hybrid operating theater for treatment of both the intra-abdominal hemorrhage and blunt aortic injury. Damage control laparotomy and thoracic endovascular aortic repair were performed uneventfully. Hybrid treatment, which combines emergency surgery and intraoperative interventional radiology, provides a prompt and appropriate management approach for the treatment of patients with severe multiple trauma and may improve patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,554,389
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#530
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,900
of 317,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.