↓ Skip to main content

MetaCluster-TA: taxonomic annotation for metagenomic data based on assembly-assisted binning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MetaCluster-TA: taxonomic annotation for metagenomic data based on assembly-assisted binning
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-s1-s12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Wang, Henry Chi Ming Leung, Siu Ming Yiu, Francis Yuk Lun Chin

Abstract

Taxonomic annotation of reads is an important problem in metagenomic analysis. Existing annotation tools, which rely on the approach of aligning each read to the taxonomic structure, are unable to annotate many reads efficiently and accurately as reads (~100 bp) are short and most of them come from unknown genomes. Previous work has suggested assembling the reads to make longer contigs before annotation. More reads/contigs can be annotated as a longer contig (in Kbp) can be aligned to a taxon even if it is from an unknown species as long as it contains a conserved region of that taxon. Unfortunately existing metagenomic assembly tools are not mature enough to produce long enough contigs. Binning tries to group reads/contigs of similar species together. Intuitively, reads in the same group (cluster) should be annotated to the same taxon and these reads altogether should cover a significant portion of the genome alleviating the problem of short contigs if the quality of binning is high. However, no existing work has tried to use binning results to help solve the annotation problem. This work explores this direction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Estonia 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 103 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Master 16 14%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Computer Science 12 10%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,260,662
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,077
of 11,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,633
of 319,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#135
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.