↓ Skip to main content

A systematic evaluation of nucleotide properties for CRISPR sgRNA design

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic evaluation of nucleotide properties for CRISPR sgRNA design
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1697-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pei Fen Kuan, Scott Powers, Shuyao He, Kaiqiao Li, Xiaoyu Zhao, Bo Huang

Abstract

CRISPR is a versatile gene editing tool which has revolutionized genetic research in the past few years. Optimizing sgRNA design to improve the efficiency of target/DNA cleavage is critical to ensure the success of CRISPR screens. By borrowing knowledge from oligonucleotide design and nucleosome occupancy models, we systematically evaluated candidate features computed from a number of nucleic acid, thermodynamic and secondary structure models on real CRISPR datasets. Our results showed that taking into account position-dependent dinucleotide features improved the design of effective sgRNAs with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) >0.8, and the inclusion of additional features offered marginal improvement (∼2% increase in AUC). Using a machine-learning approach, we proposed an accurate prediction model for sgRNA design efficiency. An R package predictSGRNA implementing the predictive model is available at http://www.ams.sunysb.edu/~pfkuan/softwares.html#predictsgrna .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,761,355
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,784
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,172
of 320,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.