↓ Skip to main content

The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
644 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical Applications
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2003
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie Bruce, James F Fries

Abstract

The ability to effectively measure health-related quality-of-life longitudinally is central to describing the impacts of disease, treatment, or other insults, including normal aging, upon the patient. Over the last two decades, assessment of patient health status has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift, evolving from a predominant reliance on biochemical and physical measurements, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, lipid profiles, or radiographs, to an emphasis upon health outcomes based on the patient's personal appreciation of their illness. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), published in 1980, was among the first instruments based on generic, patient-centered dimensions. The HAQ was designed to represent a model of patient-oriented outcome assessment and has played a major role in many diverse areas such as prediction of successful aging, inversion of the therapeutic pyramid in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), quantification of NSAID gastropathy, development of risk factor models for osteoarthrosis, and examination of mortality risks in RA. Evidenced by its use over the past two decades in diverse settings, the HAQ has established itself as a valuable, effective, and sensitive tool for measurement of health status. It is available in more than 60 languages and is supported by a bibliography of more than 500 references. It has increased the credibility and use of validated self-report measurement techniques as a quantifiable set of hard data endpoints and has contributed to a new appreciation of outcome assessment. In this article, information regarding the HAQ's development, content, dissemination and reference sources for its uses, translations, and validations are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 460 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 11%
Researcher 51 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Postgraduate 38 8%
Other 117 25%
Unknown 93 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 193 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 71 15%
Unknown 126 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,102,121
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#348
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,712
of 54,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.