You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fourth Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1708-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glenn Hernández, Jean-Louis Teboul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Mexico | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Design | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,299,688
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,085
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,191
of 330,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.