You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Kenyan children aged less than five years: results of an open-label, randomized, single-centre study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-33 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bernhards R Ogutu, Kevin O Onyango, Nelly Koskei, Edgar K Omondi, John M Ongecha, Godfrey A Otieno, Charles Obonyo, Lucas Otieno, Fredrick Eyase, Jacob D Johnson, Raymond Omollo, Douglas J Perkins, Willis Akhwale, Elizabeth Juma |
Abstract |
This open-label, randomized study evaluated efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) in treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children below five years of age, to build evidence on use of AL as first-line treatment and DP as second-line treatment in Kenya. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,402,089
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,851
of 5,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,508
of 307,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#30
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.