You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc8875 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jochen Mayer, Joachim Boldt, Andinet M Mengistu, Kerstin D Röhm, Stefan Suttner |
Abstract |
Several studies have shown that goal-directed hemodynamic and fluid optimization may result in improved outcome. However, the methods used were either invasive or had other limitations. The aim of this study was to perform intraoperative goal-directed therapy with a minimally invasive, easy to use device (FloTrac/Vigileo), and to evaluate possible improvements in patient outcome determined by the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of complications compared to a standard management protocol. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 204 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 38 | 18% |
Other | 32 | 15% |
Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Other | 53 | 25% |
Unknown | 28 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 73% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | <1% |
Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,769,893
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,861
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,828
of 184,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.