↓ Skip to main content

Access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and factors associated with non-use among communities in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah governorate in the Tihama region, west of Yemen

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and factors associated with non-use among communities in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah governorate in the Tihama region, west of Yemen
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12936-017-1894-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samira M. A. Al-Eryani, Mohammed A. K. Mahdy, Abdulsalam M. Al-Mekhlafi, Rashad Abdul-Ghani

Abstract

Universal coverage of the targeted malaria-endemic areas with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is implemented as one of the key interventions for malaria control and elimination in Yemen. In 2013, through a mass campaign, LLINs were distributed to the targeted communities in Al Hudaydah governorate. This study aimed to assess the ownership of, access to, and use of LLINs. It also aimed to identify factors associated with not using LLINs in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah in the Tihama region, west of Yemen. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in four districts (Ad Durayhimi, Al Marawi'ah, Al Mansuriyah and Bayt Al Faqiah) in Al Hudaydah during February 2016. A total of 701 households were included in this study. Data on socio-demographic characteristics and availability of LLINs were collected by interview and observation. Four indicators for malaria prevention using LLINs; proportion of households with at least one LLIN, proportion of households with at least one LLIN for every two people, proportion of population with access to LLINs in the surveyed households and proportion of population who slept under LLINs the previous night of the survey were calculated as indicated by Roll Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group. Use to access ratio was assessed. Factors associated with not using LLINs among people with access were also investigated. Of 701 households with 4900 de facto population, ownership of at least one LLIN was 90.6%, while 24.1% owned at least one for every two people during the survey in 2016. The overall proportion of people with access to LLINs was 51.5% (95% CI 50.1-52.9). Only 19.0% (95% CI 17.9-20.1) slept under LLINs the night before the survey and the overall use to access ratio was 0.37. The proportions of children under 5 years of age with access to and use of LLINs were 13.7 and 42.5%, respectively. On the other hand, the proportions of pregnant women with access to and use of LLINs were 16.4 and 20.0%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified that people living in Al Mansuriyah district [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)  1.35-8.01; P = 0.009)], having three or more damaged LLINs in the house (AOR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.79-4.25; P < 0.001), aged between 16 and 45 years old (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.26-3.75; P = 0.005) or older (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09-4.29; P = 0.026) and living in huts (AOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.32; P = 0.015) were significantly less likely to use LLINs. This study shows a low LLIN access rate among local communities targeted for universal LLIN coverage in Al Hudaydah, a malaria-endemic area of high transmission. This finding necessitates additional distribution channels following mass campaigns to maintain the universal coverage. Reduced use of LLINs among people with access in these communities together with the identified risks of non-use highlight the importance of conducting behaviour change communication campaigns to enhance using LLINs in areas with universal coverage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 30 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 32 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,084,740
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,156
of 5,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,393
of 323,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#38
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.