↓ Skip to main content

Defense against HSV-1 in a murine model is mediated by iNOS and orchestrated by the activation of TLR2 and TLR9 in trigeminal ganglia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defense against HSV-1 in a murine model is mediated by iNOS and orchestrated by the activation of TLR2 and TLR9 in trigeminal ganglia
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-11-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Pimenta Zolini, Graciela Kunrath Lima, Natália Lucinda, Mariana Almeida Silva, Marcela França Dias, Natália Lima Pessoa, Bruna Pizziolo Coura, Christiane Teixeira Cartelle, Rosa Maria Esteves Arantes, Erna Geessien Kroon, Marco Antônio Campos

Abstract

Herpes simplex 1 (HSV-1) causes various human clinical manifestations, ranging from simple cold sores to encephalitis. Innate immune cells recognize pathogens through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), thus initiating the immune response. Previously, we demonstrated that the immune response against HSV-1 is dependent on TLR2 and TLR9 expression and on IFN gamma production in the trigeminal ganglia (TG) of infected mice. In this work, we further investigated the cells, molecules, and mechanisms of HSV-1 infection control, especially those that are TLR-dependent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2,058
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,806
of 307,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#50
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.