You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cleavage clock regulates features of lineage-specific differentiation in the development of a basal branching metazoan, the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EvoDevo, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-9139-5-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antje HL Fischer, Kevin Pang, Jonathan Q Henry, Mark Q Martindale |
| Abstract |
An important question in experimental embryology is to understand how the developmental potential responsible for the generation of distinct cell types is spatially segregated over developmental time. Classical embryological work showed that ctenophores, a group of gelatinous marine invertebrates that arose early in animal evolution, display a highly stereotyped pattern of early development and a precocious specification of blastomere fates. Here we investigate the role of autonomous cell specification and the developmental timing of two distinct ctenophore cell types (motile compound comb-plate-like cilia and light-emitting photocytes) in embryos of the lobate ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,404,716
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from EvoDevo
#30
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,386
of 306,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EvoDevo
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.