↓ Skip to main content

French validation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ)

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
French validation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ)
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13013-017-0126-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Deceuninck, Aurélie Tirat-Herbert, Nuria Rodriguez Martinez, Jean-Claude Bernard

Abstract

Quality of Life (QoL) scales have to be introduced in the treatment evaluation of our patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Vasiliadis et. al. created the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ), which is specific for brace-treated adolescents. This tool was developed and validated in Greek. The aim of our study was to undertake the process of cultural adaptation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) into French. The BrQ is made of 34 items on Likert scale, divided in eight domains. The questionnaire was developed for self-completion by the children and is adapted for 9 to 18-year-old patients. The process of cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was in accordance with the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) guidelines. In the first place, descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean scores and standard deviations for a given question and a domain. The second level was comparative, concerning reliability and validity. The internal consistency was satisfactory; Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85. There were no floor or ceiling effects. The French version of the BrQ (F-BrQ) is reliable and reproducible, and can therefore be used to evaluate the quality of life of children and adolescents treated with a brace for idiopathic scoliosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,464,404
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#61
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,254
of 317,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.