↓ Skip to main content

Improving activity recognition using a wearable barometric pressure sensor in mobility-impaired stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving activity recognition using a wearable barometric pressure sensor in mobility-impaired stroke patients
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0060-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabien Massé, Roman R. Gonzenbach, Arash Arami, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Andreas R. Luft, Kamiar Aminian

Abstract

Stroke survivors often suffer from mobility deficits. Current clinical evaluation methods, including questionnaires and motor function tests, cannot provide an objective measure of the patients' mobility in daily life. Physical activity performance in daily-life can be assessed using unobtrusive monitoring, for example with a single sensor module fixed on the trunk. Existing approaches based on inertial sensors have limited performance, particularly in detecting transitions between different activities and postures, due to the inherent inter-patient variability of kinematic patterns. To overcome these limitations, one possibility is to use additional information from a barometric pressure (BP) sensor. Our study aims at integrating BP and inertial sensor data into an activity classifier in order to improve the activity (sitting, standing, walking, lying) recognition and the corresponding body elevation (during climbing stairs or when taking an elevator). Taking into account the trunk elevation changes during postural transitions (sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit), we devised an event-driven activity classifier based on fuzzy-logic. Data were acquired from 12 stroke patients with impaired mobility, using a trunk-worn inertial and BP sensor. Events, including walking and lying periods and potential postural transitions, were first extracted. These events were then fed into a double-stage hierarchical Fuzzy Inference System (H-FIS). The first stage processed the events to infer activities and the second stage improved activity recognition by applying behavioral constraints. Finally, the body elevation was estimated using a pattern-enhancing algorithm applied on BP. The patients were videotaped for reference. The performance of the algorithm was estimated using the Correct Classification Rate (CCR) and F-score. The BP-based classification approach was benchmarked against a previously-published fuzzy-logic classifier (FIS-IMU) and a conventional epoch-based classifier (EPOCH). The algorithm performance for posture/activity detection, in terms of CCR was 90.4 %, with 3.3 % and 5.6 % improvements against FIS-IMU and EPOCH, respectively. The proposed classifier essentially benefits from a better recognition of standing activity (70.3 % versus 61.5 % [FIS-IMU] and 42.5 % [EPOCH]) with 98.2 % CCR for body elevation estimation. The monitoring and recognition of daily activities in mobility-impaired stoke patients can be significantly improved using a trunk-fixed sensor that integrates BP, inertial sensors, and an event-based activity classifier.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 24%
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 45 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Computer Science 14 7%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 65 34%