↓ Skip to main content

Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella from poultry industries in Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Veterinary Journal, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella from poultry industries in Korea
Published in
Irish Veterinary Journal, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13620-017-0095-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Eui Kim, Young ju Lee

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistant Salmonella strains are a direct threat to human health when this resistance interferes with treatment and an indirect threat when resistance can be transferred to other human pathogens. The objective of the present study was to characterize antimicrobial resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) isolates recovered from poultry industries, including a description of genetic diversity and virulence profiles. In total of 93 Salmonella isolates shown antimicrobial resistance to one or more drugs, all isolates exhibited common resistance to streptomycin, nalidixic acid and cephalothin but no ciprofloxacin resistance. Among 26 virulence gene profiling, 12 virulence genes, invA, orgA, prgH, sopB, tolC, sipB, gatC, msgA, pagC, spiA, sifA, and sitC were found in all antimicrobial-resistant NTS isolates. In comparing the data from ERIC-PCR clusters, virulence profiles and resistance profiles, some Salmonella isolates grouped into the same cluster were found to exhibit similar virulence and resistance patterns. Virulence profiling combined with ERIC-PCR offered a rapid approach to characterize antimicrobial-resistant NTS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 30 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Irish Veterinary Journal
#224
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,743
of 331,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Veterinary Journal
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.