↓ Skip to main content

Predictors for delayed encephalopathy following acute carbon monoxide poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors for delayed encephalopathy following acute carbon monoxide poisoning
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-14-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaoru Kudo, Kotaro Otsuka, Junko Yagi, Katsumi Sanjo, Noritaka Koizumi, Atsuhiko Koeda, Miki Yokota Umetsu, Yasuhito Yoshioka, Ayumi Mizugai, Toshinari Mita, Yu Shiga, Fumito Koizumi, Hikaru Nakamura, Akio Sakai

Abstract

In Japan, many carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning cases are transported to emergency settings, making treatment and prognostic assessment an urgent task. However, there is currently no reliable means to predict whether "delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae (DNS)" will develop after acute CO poisoning. This study is intended to find out risk factors for the development of DNS and to characterize the clinical course following the development of DNS in acute CO poisoning cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 44%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,782,242
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#308
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,502
of 312,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.