You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sergiu Netotea, David Sundell, Nathaniel R Street, Torgeir R Hvidsten |
| Abstract |
Divergence in gene regulation has emerged as a key mechanism underlying species differentiation. Comparative analysis of co-expression networks across species can reveal conservation and divergence in the regulation of genes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,170,084
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,750
of 10,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,293
of 307,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#195
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.