You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The INSPIRED study: a randomised controlled trial of the Whole Person Model of disease self-management for people with type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M Clarke, Donita E Baird, Dinali N Perera, Virginia L Hagger, Helena J Teede |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes has increased dramatically in the last decade, and is continuing to rise. It is a chronic condition, often related to obesity, diet and sedentary lifestyles, and can lead to significant health complications, disability and early death. Diabetes is commonly associated with depression, which can impact significantly on a person's ability to manage their illness and, consequently, on disease outcomes. Disease self-management is fundamental in diabetes and requires support from multiple health professionals and the active participation of the person, including in maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The Whole Person Model was developed in order to integrate emotional and behavioural aspects into a self-management program for people with type 2 diabetes. Here we describe a study designed to test the efficacy of the Whole Person Model of disease self-management in type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 353 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Researcher | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 19% |
| Psychology | 43 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 101 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,445,966
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,725
of 15,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,429
of 316,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#243
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.