↓ Skip to main content

Numbers needed to treat calculated from responder rates give a better indication of efficacy in osteoarthritis trials than mean pain scores

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numbers needed to treat calculated from responder rates give a better indication of efficacy in osteoarthritis trials than mean pain scores
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/ar2394
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Andrew Moore, Owen A Moore, Sheena Derry, Henry J McQuay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,612
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,891
of 95,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.