You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Educating novice practitioners to detect elder financial abuse: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priscilla Harries, Miranda Davies, Ken Gilhooly, Mary Gilhooly, Christopher Tomlinson |
| Abstract |
Health and social care professionals are well positioned to identify and intervene in cases of elder financial abuse. An evidence-based educational intervention was developed to advance practitioners' decision-making in this domain. The objective was to test the effectiveness of a decision-training educational intervention on novices' ability to detect elder financial abuse. The research was funded by an E.S.R.C. grant reference RES-189-25-0334. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,257
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,718
of 307,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#33
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.