↓ Skip to main content

Nucleated red blood cells in the blood of medical intensive care patients indicate increased mortality risk: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nucleated red blood cells in the blood of medical intensive care patients indicate increased mortality risk: a prospective cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Stachon, Elmar Segbers, Tim Holland-Letz, Reiner Kempf, Steffen Hering, Michael Krieg

Abstract

In critically ill patients, the appearance of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in blood is associated with a variety of severe diseases. Generally, when NRBCs are detected in the patients' blood, the prognosis is poor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Other 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,805
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,599
of 82,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.