You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An institution-wide approach to submission, review, and funding of simulation-based curricula
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-017-0042-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David H. Salzman, Diane B. Wayne, Walter J. Eppich, Eric S. Hungness, Mark D. Adler, Christine S. Park, Katherine A. Barsness, William C. McGaghie, Jeffrey H. Barsuk |
| Abstract |
This article describes the development, implementation, and modification of an institutional process to evaluate and fund graduate medical education simulation curricula. The goals of this activity were to (a) establish a standardized mechanism for proposal submission and evaluation, (b) identify simulation-based medical education (SBME) curricula that would benefit from mentored improvement before implementation, and (c) ensure that funding decisions were fair and defensible. Our intent was to develop a process that was grounded in sound educational principles, allowed for efficient administrative oversight, ensured approved courses were high quality, encouraged simulation education research and scholarship, and provided opportunities for medical specialties that had not previously used SBME to receive mentoring and faculty development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 28% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,025,156
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#97
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,341
of 322,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.