You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare Liddy, Jatinderpreet Singh, Ryan Kelly, Simone Dahrouge, Monica Taljaard, Jamie Younger |
| Abstract |
Several new primary care models have been implemented in Ontario, Canada over the past two decades. These practice models differ in team structure, physician remuneration, and group size. Few studies have examined the impact of these models on specialist referrals. We compared specialist referral rates amongst three primary care models: 1) Enhanced Fee-for-service, 2) Capitation- Non-Interdisciplinary (CAP-NI), 3) Capitation - Interdisciplinary (CAP-I). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |