↓ Skip to main content

Selection of peptides binding to metallic borides by screening M13 phage display libraries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selection of peptides binding to metallic borides by screening M13 phage display libraries
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-14-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Ploss, Sandra J Facey, Carina Bruhn, Limor Zemel, Kathrin Hofmann, Robert W Stark, Barbara Albert, Bernhard Hauer

Abstract

Metal borides are a class of inorganic solids that is much less known and investigated than for example metal oxides or intermetallics. At the same time it is a highly versatile and interesting class of compounds in terms of physical and chemical properties, like semiconductivity, ferromagnetism, or catalytic activity. This makes these substances attractive for the generation of new materials. Very little is known about the interaction between organic materials and borides. To generate nanostructured and composite materials which consist of metal borides and organic modifiers it is necessary to develop new synthetic strategies. Phage peptide display libraries are commonly used to select peptides that bind specifically to metals, metal oxides, and semiconductors. Further, these binding peptides can serve as templates to control the nucleation and growth of inorganic nanoparticles. Additionally, the combination of two different binding motifs into a single bifunctional phage could be useful for the generation of new composite materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Sri Lanka 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Chemistry 9 17%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#763
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,608
of 311,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.