You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence and diagnosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in the intensive care unit: an international online survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13725 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Rodríguez, Pedro Póvoa, Saad Nseir, Jorge Salluh, Daniel Curcio, Ignacio Martín-Loeches |
| Abstract |
Several aspects of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) remain poorly defined, including diagnostic criteria, overlap with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and appropriate treatment regimens. The objective of this study was to survey reported practices in the clinical and microbiological diagnosis of VAT, and to evaluate perceptions of the impact of VAT on patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Argentina | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 28% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 59% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,224
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,916
of 329,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#65
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.