↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of molecular serotyping approaches of Streptococcus agalactiae from genomic sequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of molecular serotyping approaches of Streptococcus agalactiae from genomic sequences
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12864-017-3820-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia Kapatai, Darshana Patel, Androulla Efstratiou, Victoria J. Chalker

Abstract

Group B streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide is one of the major virulence factors underlying invasive GBS disease and a component of forthcoming vaccines. Serotype classification of GBS is based on the capsule polysaccharide of which ten variants are known to exist (Ia, Ib, II-IX). Current methods for GBS serotype assignment rely on latex agglutination or PCR while more recently a whole genome sequencing method was reported. In this study, three distinct algorithms for serotype assignment from genomic data were assessed using a panel of 790 clinical isolates. The first approach utilised the entire capsular locus coupled with a mapping methodology. The second approach continues from the first and utilised a SNP-based methodology across the conserved cpsD-G region to differentiate serotypes Ia-VII and IX. Finally the third approach used the variable cpsG -K region coupled with a mapping methodology. All three approaches were assessed for typeability (percentage of isolates assigned a serotype) and concordance to the latex agglutination methodology. Following comparisons, the third approach using the variable cpsG-K region demonstrated the best performance with 99.9% typeability and 86.7% concordance. Overall, of the 105 discordant isolates, 71 were resolved following retesting of latex agglutination and whole genome sequencing, 20 failed to assign a serotype using latex agglutination and only 14 were found to be truly discordant on re-testing. Comparison of this final approach with the previously described assembly-based approach returned identical results. These results demonstrated that molecular capsular typing using whole genome sequencing and a mapping-based approach is a viable alternative to the traditional, latex agglutination-based serotyping method and can be implemented in a public health microbiology setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 16 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,899,796
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,607
of 10,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,387
of 316,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#158
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.