↓ Skip to main content

Systolic blood pressure variability in patients with early severe sepsis or septic shock: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systolic blood pressure variability in patients with early severe sepsis or septic shock: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12871-017-0377-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Tang, Jeff Sorenson, Michael Lanspa, Colin K. Grissom, V.J. Mathews, Samuel M. Brown

Abstract

Severe sepsis and septic shock are often lethal syndromes, in which the autonomic nervous system may fail to maintain adequate blood pressure. Heart rate variability has been associated with outcomes in sepsis. Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability is associated with clinical outcomes in septic patients is unknown. The propose of this study is to determine whether variability in SBP correlates with vasopressor independence and mortality among septic patients. We prospectively studied patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with an arterial catheter. We analyzed SBP variability on the first 5-min window immediately following ICU admission. We performed principal component analysis of multidimensional complexity, and used the first principal component (PC1) as input for Firth logistic regression, controlling for mean systolic pressure (SBP) in the primary analyses, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score or NEE dose in the ancillary analyses. Prespecified outcomes were vasopressor independence at 24 h (primary), and 28-day mortality (secondary). We studied 51 patients, 51% of whom achieved vasopressor independence at 24 h. Ten percent died at 28 days. PC1 represented 26% of the variance in complexity measures. PC1 was not associated with vasopressor independence on Firth logistic regression (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93-1.16; p = 0.54), but was associated with 28-day mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35, p = 0.040). Early SBP variability appears to be associated with 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,865,778
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#468
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,900
of 316,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.