↓ Skip to main content

Individual differences in autistic traits predict the perception of direct gaze for males, but not for females

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Autism, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual differences in autistic traits predict the perception of direct gaze for males, but not for females
Published in
Molecular Autism, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2040-2392-5-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Matsuyoshi, Kana Kuraguchi, Yumiko Tanaka, Seina Uchida, Hiroshi Ashida, Katsumi Watanabe

Abstract

Despite the emphasis of autism spectrum disorders as a continuum of atypical social behaviors and the sexual heterogeneity of phenotypic manifestations, whether gaze processing constitutes an autistic endophenotype in both sexes remains unclear. Using the Autism-Spectrum Quotient and a psychophysical approach in a normal population (N = 128), here we demonstrated that individual differences in autistic traits predicted direct-gaze perception for males, but not for females. Our findings suggest that direct-gaze perception may not constitute an autistic endophenotype in both sexes, and highlight the importance of sex differences when considering relationships between autistic traits and behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 53%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,441,837
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Autism
#412
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,049
of 331,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Autism
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.