↓ Skip to main content

The many faces of Pluripotency: in vitro adaptations of a continuum of in vivo states

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The many faces of Pluripotency: in vitro adaptations of a continuum of in vivo states
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12861-017-0150-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Morgani, Jennifer Nichols, Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

Abstract

Pluripotency defines the propensity of a cell to differentiate into, and generate, all somatic, as well as germ cells. The epiblast of the early mammalian embryo is the founder population of all germ layer derivatives and thus represents the bona fide in vivo pluripotent cell population. The so-called pluripotent state spans several days of development and is lost during gastrulation as epiblast cells make fate decisions towards a mesoderm, endoderm or ectoderm identity. It is now widely recognized that the features of the pluripotent population evolve as development proceeds from the pre- to post-implantation period, marked by distinct transcriptional and epigenetic signatures. During this period of time epiblast cells mature through a continuum of pluripotent states with unique properties. Aspects of this pluripotent continuum can be captured in vitro in the form of stable pluripotent stem cell types. In this review we discuss the continuum of pluripotency existing within the mammalian embryo, using the mouse as a model, and the cognate stem cell types that can be derived and propagated in vitro. Furthermore, we speculate on embryonic stage-specific characteristics that could be utilized to identify novel, developmentally relevant, pluripotent states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 311 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 20%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 80 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 144 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Chemistry 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 80 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,174,980
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#120
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,115
of 319,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them