↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the barriers and improving care in type 2 diabetes: Brazilian perspective in time to do more in diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the barriers and improving care in type 2 diabetes: Brazilian perspective in time to do more in diabetes
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13098-017-0244-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sérgio Vencio, Päivi M. Paldánius, Matthias Blüher, Daniel Giannella-Neto, Rafael Caiado-Vencio, W. David Strain

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex disease, particularly in a continental country like Brazil. We attempted to understand and evaluate the perceptions and routines of Brazilians with T2DM and physicians, compared with other countries. We compared the results from a 20-min online survey in Brazil with simultaneously collated data from India, Japan, Spain, UK and USA. In total, 652 adults with T2DM and 337 treating physicians were enrolled, of whom 100 patients and 55 physicians were from Brazil. The numbers of primary care physicians from the five countries were 221 versus 43 in Brazil, diabetes specialists were 61 versus 12. There was disconnect between the opinions of physicians and people with diabetes globally. Further, there were differences between clinical practices in Brazil versus the rest of the world, in many areas Brazilians were performing better. Communication between patients and physicians should be clearer. There is an urgent need to identify the deficits in education, in order to address the clinical inertia within the diabetes management team. There is a necessity to understand the specific requirements of the Brazilian population in order to contextualise international guidelines and implement local changes in practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 44%