Title |
Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Women's Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirk D Wyatt, Ryan T Anderson, Douglas Creedon, Victor M Montori, John Bachman, Patricia Erwin, Annie LeBlanc |
Abstract |
Women can choose from a range of contraceptive methods that differ in important ways. Inadequate decision support may lead them to select a method that poorly fits their circumstances, leading to dissatisfaction, misuse, or nonuse. Decision support interventions, such as decision aids, may help women choose a method of contraception that best fits their personal circumstances. To guide future decision aid development, we aim to summarize the attributes of contraceptive methods included in available decision aids as well as surveys and interviews of women actively choosing a contraceptive method. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 185 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
Researcher | 31 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
Other | 36 | 19% |
Unknown | 34 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 14% |
Psychology | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 14% |
Unknown | 45 | 24% |