You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fenofibrate induces apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells via activation of NF-κB pathway
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-96 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ting Li, Qunling Zhang, Jian Zhang, Gong Yang, Zhimin Shao, Jianmin Luo, Minhao Fan, Chen Ni, Zhenhua Wu, Xichun Hu |
Abstract |
There are a lot of unmet needs in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonist, has been used for decades to treat hypertriglyceridaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia. Recent studies show that it might have anti-tumor effects, however, the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we assessed the ability of fenofibrate to induce apoptosis of TNBC in vitro and in vivo and explored involved mechanisms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,279,323
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,568
of 9,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,770
of 237,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#30
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.