↓ Skip to main content

Fenofibrate induces apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells via activation of NF-κB pathway

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fenofibrate induces apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells via activation of NF-κB pathway
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Li, Qunling Zhang, Jian Zhang, Gong Yang, Zhimin Shao, Jianmin Luo, Minhao Fan, Chen Ni, Zhenhua Wu, Xichun Hu

Abstract

There are a lot of unmet needs in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonist, has been used for decades to treat hypertriglyceridaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia. Recent studies show that it might have anti-tumor effects, however, the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we assessed the ability of fenofibrate to induce apoptosis of TNBC in vitro and in vivo and explored involved mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,279,323
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,568
of 9,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,770
of 237,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#30
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.