↓ Skip to main content

Drug waste minimization as an effective strategy of cost-containment in Oncology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug waste minimization as an effective strategy of cost-containment in Oncology
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianpiero Fasola, Giuseppe Aprile, Luisa Marini, Alessandro Follador, Mauro Mansutti, Manuela Miscoria

Abstract

Sustainability of cancer care is a crucial issue for health care systems worldwide, even more during a time of economic recession. Low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. In this paper we aim to demonstrate the efficacy of drug waste minimization in reducing drug-related costs and its importance as a structural measure in health care management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,910,091
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,904
of 7,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,979
of 307,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#76
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.