↓ Skip to main content

Measuring electromagnetic fields (EMF) around wind turbines in Canada: is there a human health concern?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring electromagnetic fields (EMF) around wind turbines in Canada: is there a human health concern?
Published in
Environmental Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-13-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay C McCallum, Melissa L Whitfield Aslund, Loren D Knopper, Glenn M Ferguson, Christopher A Ollson

Abstract

The past five years has seen considerable expansion of wind power generation in Ontario, Canada. Most recently worries about exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from wind turbines, and associated electrical transmission, has been raised at public meetings and legal proceedings. These fears have not been based on any actual measurements of EMF exposure surrounding existing projects but appear to follow from worries from internet sources and misunderstanding of the science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Other 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Engineering 14 14%
Physics and Astronomy 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,179,627
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#258
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,861
of 347,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.