You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of gender on COPD expression in a real-life cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-15-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Roche, Gaetan Deslée, Denis Caillaud, Graziella Brinchault, Isabelle Court-Fortune, Pascale Nesme-Meyer, Pascale Surpas, Roger Escamilla, Thierry Perez, Pascal Chanez, Christophe Pinet, Gilles Jebrak, Jean-Louis Paillasseur, Pierre-Régis Burgel, the INITIATIVES BPCO Scientific Committee |
| Abstract |
Reports regarding gender-related differences in COPD expression have provided conflicting results. In the French Initiatives BPCO real-world cohort, which contained 688 patients (146 women) when data were extracted, women were matched with men (1:3 ratio: n = 107:275) on age (5-year intervals) and FEV1 (5% predicted intervals) and comparisons were performed using univariate logistic regressions. For a given age and level of airflow obstruction, women with COPD had higher BOD scores due to more pronounced dyspnea and lower BMI, suggesting worse prognosis, and were more likely to exhibit anxiety, suggesting the need for specific assessment and care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,256,694
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,318
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,197
of 238,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.