↓ Skip to main content

A pilot study on the use of interferon beta-1a in early Alzheimer’s disease subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot study on the use of interferon beta-1a in early Alzheimer’s disease subjects
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-11-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi Maria Edoardo Grimaldi, Giuseppe Zappalà, Francesco Iemolo, Anna Elisa Castellano, Stefano Ruggieri, Giuseppe Bruno, Andrea Paolillo

Abstract

Despite the fact that multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) share common neuroimmunological features, interferon beta 1a (IFNβ1a), the well-established treatment for the prevention of disease progression and cognitive decline in MS patients, has never been used in AD. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of IFNβ1a in subjects affected by mild-to-moderate AD in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter pilot study. Forty-two early Alzheimer's patients were randomized to receive either a 22 mcg subcutaneous injection of IFNβ1a or placebo three times per week. A treatment period of 28 weeks was followed by 24 weeks of observation. IFNβ1a was well tolerated and adverse events were infrequent and mild to moderate. Although not statistically significant, a reduction in disease progression during follow-up was measured in IFNβ1a-treated patients by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale. Interestingly, the treatment group showed significant improvements in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Physical Self-maintenance Scale. This study suggests that IFNβ1a is safe and well tolerated in early AD patients, and its possible beneficial role should be further investigated in larger studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 30 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,335,414
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#551
of 2,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,666
of 331,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.