↓ Skip to main content

Using vignettes in qualitative research to explore barriers and facilitating factors to the uptake of prevention of mother-to-child transmission services in rural Tanzania: a critical analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using vignettes in qualitative research to explore barriers and facilitating factors to the uptake of prevention of mother-to-child transmission services in rural Tanzania: a critical analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annabelle Gourlay, Gerry Mshana, Isolde Birdthistle, Grace Bulugu, Basia Zaba, Mark Urassa

Abstract

Vignettes are short stories about a hypothetical person, traditionally used within research (quantitative or qualitative) on sensitive topics in the developed world. Studies using vignettes in the developing world are emerging, but with no critical examination of their usefulness in such settings. We describe the development and application of vignettes to a qualitative investigation of barriers to uptake of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) HIV services in rural Tanzania in 2012, and critique the successes and challenges of using the technique in this setting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 298 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 17%
Student > Master 48 16%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Lecturer 19 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 64 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Psychology 26 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 83 27%