↓ Skip to main content

First look: a cluster-randomized trial of ultrasound to improve pregnancy outcomes in low income country settings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First look: a cluster-randomized trial of ultrasound to improve pregnancy outcomes in low income country settings
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth M McClure, Robert O Nathan, Sarah Saleem, Fabian Esamai, Ana Garces, Elwyn Chomba, Antoinette Tshefu, David Swanson, Hillary Mabeya, Lester Figuero, Waseem Mirza, David Muyodi, Holly Franklin, Adrien Lokangaka, Dieudonne Bidashimwa, Omrana Pasha, Musaku Mwenechanya, Carl L Bose, Waldemar A Carlo, K Michael Hambidge, Edward A Liechty, Nancy Krebs, Dennis D Wallace, Jonathan Swanson, Marion Koso-Thomas, Rexford Widmer, Robert L Goldenberg

Abstract

In high-resource settings, obstetric ultrasound is a standard component of prenatal care used to identify pregnancy complications and to establish an accurate gestational age in order to improve obstetric care. Whether or not ultrasound use will improve care and ultimately pregnancy outcomes in low-resource settings is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 307 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 18%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 88 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 13%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 107 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,402,843
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,786
of 4,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,011
of 223,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#68
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.