↓ Skip to main content

Targeted rehabilitation to improve outcome after total knee replacement (TRIO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeted rehabilitation to improve outcome after total knee replacement (TRIO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Hamish RW Simpson, David F Hamilton, David J Beard, Karen L Barker, Timothy Wilton, James D Hutchison, Chris Tuck, Andrew Stoddard, Gary J Macfarlane, Gordon D Murray

Abstract

Approximately 20% of patients are not satisfied with the outcome of total knee replacement, great volumes of which are carried out yearly. Physiotherapy is often provided by the NHS to address dysfunction following knee replacement; however the efficacy of this is unknown. Although clinically it is accepted that therapy is useful, provision of physiotherapy to all patients post-operatively does not enhance outcomes at one year. No study has previously assessed the effect of targeting therapy to individuals struggling to recover in the early post-operative phase.The aim of the TRIO study is to determine whether stratifying care by targeting physiotherapy to those individuals performing poorly following knee replacement is effective in improving the one year outcomes. We are also investigating whether the structure of the physiotherapy provision itself influences outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 21%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 68 33%